Staff correspondent
Activities of the accused during the BDR mutiny on 25-26 February 2009 were destabilizing 'patronize by a group of interest' to the country, the plaintiff said of the case carnage BDR Dhaka Court on Wednesday.
'..... .the accused committed (activities) to illegal with sick designs, synonymous with the incitement and serious offence, use ' the plaintiffs of the case of NABA Jyoti Khisa, metropolitan Dhaka sessions Court said the judge Mohammad Jahurul Haque, where his deposition.
The Court had indicted earlier 824 BDR men and 23 civilians with murder and 25 crimes now renamed 2009 Office, during the rebellion at the headquarters of Bangladesh rifles, as border Bangladesh, Dhaka on February.
The Court began formal process at about 09: 45 depicting the deposition of the plaintiff in the makeshift courthouse on the ground of Aliya Madrasah Bakshi Bazar in the capital amid tightened security and rain set up.
The first of 1.287 prosecution witnesses, NABA Jyoti, also a former officer-in-charge of Lalbagh police station in his deposition the role of the accused and the State of the survivors in detail during the mutiny headquarters of the German civil code.
'Deputed' the accused led by, had killed the father Tawhidul Alam in complicity with each other and critically injured, army officers, in BDR and their family members and other people and committed arson, theft, pillage, disposal of bodies of dumping or buried in mass graves and other crimes..., said NABA Jyoti.
The plaintiff in the Swabia for almost two hours said that hundreds of BDR passed their arms soldiers in the evening of February of 26.
He said he had seen BDR soldiers, return to the barracks after the weapons and uniforms and weapons, ammunition and grenades, found in different parts of the BDR headquarters in Pilkhana.
NABA Jyoti, appear uniform police court, said this time they found a total 72 provide the officers of the army, their family members and some staff of the BDR.
The plaintiff was complete to his deposition, went to the Court for a 30-minute break because of excessive rainfall, built with corrugated iron sheet created a big noise on the roof of the courthouse.
After the break, the applicant produced the first information report and relevant files.
Some of the Defense councils then began cross-examination of the plaintiff.
Some 829, including former BNP lawmaker Nasiruddin Ahmed pintu and local Awami League leader Torab Ali have been accused in the courtroom.
The Court is trial of the case then to September 7.
The criminal investigation department pressed filed charges in two cases - one for murder and other 25 crime criminal code and the other under the explosive substances Act - prevent 850 border, staff and civilians.
Twenty of the accused were still in hiding while three died in prison.
The Court on Wednesday accused charges against 831 also consulting on the design under section 3 and 4 of the explosive substances Act.
Relying on the post-mortem reports, a defender, Faruque Ahmed argued that accused 101, for the Court, that all 74 people were killed, shootings, not explosives blasts killed during the mutiny.
Referring to a statement of the High Court, Faruque said however, that it not the right how to file case of same offence.
The Court however requested to refrain from Faruque, misinterpreted the law.
'According to the law officer examination give 82 days his investigation according to the law explosive substance' Faruque told the Court.
""But", he said, ' the CID took 509 days, to investigate the case of the laws."
Citing legal bindings, Faruque told the Court that the police officers had not used explosive substance in accordance with the above-mentioned Act.
Advice, 321 accused of 831, which under the explosives on the Court for the discharge of the accused in the case of applied Substances Act.
Seventy-five including 57 officers in the army were killed in the bloody uprising, later renamed rifles, borders Bangladesh, on secondment in Bangladesh.
More on Bangladeshi News
| Source: newagebd.com